Gargant
4 years ago
[negative plurk! touches lightly on racism and DWRP]
latest #16
Gargant
4 years ago
https://images.plurk.com/2OhqBBuQdDsKjGG6z0igrW.png that's gonna be a huge "oof" from me, lads
Gargant
4 years ago
I legitimately had to read the entire question response and then double back before figuring out the word in question was "non-con".
Gargant
4 years ago
Pretty sure this is a case of thoughtlessness rather than anything maliciously, but I really. really am not sure why they've chosen to phrase that the way they have.
立即下載
narmaya
4 years ago
holy shit LMAO
narmaya
4 years ago
WOW.....
narmaya
4 years ago
i genuinely don't even know what to say to this
Gargant
4 years ago
IT'S NOT JUST ME, RIGHT?
narmaya
4 years ago
NOT AT ALL, MY FIRST REACTION WAS TO JUST
narmaya
4 years ago
squint in horror
Gargant
4 years ago
Like, the RP in question is a NSFW sexy RP so fine, noncon elements, that's legit, but like. DID NO ONE PROOF READ THAT AND THINK "MAYBE THAT ISN'T GONNA PARSE WELL"
the feℓsider.
4 years ago
I was very "one of these things is NOT LIKE THE OTHERS" until I read your explanation and. oh...
Gargant
4 years ago
I recoiled when I first saw it.
Gargant
4 years ago
like "oh god, is DWRP bad enough these days that we need to talk about that??"
CHARISMA SURFER
4 years ago
WHEEZE.......please just say "noncon"'dear lord.
Gargant
4 years ago
No kidding right......
☆XINDA☆
4 years ago
Oh.

...wow.
back to top