sebaiknya jangan. menyarankan apalagi melakukan membunuh orang itu tidak baik. bikin repot pula. eh...

yud1:
hints: those assholes never see you/us as a person or even human. so no, we dont need to see them as one

galeshka: woah, so much for the selective pacifism eh? 😛
baiklah, silakan dicontohkan kalau begitu. sebaiknya jangan, tapi kalau mau ya terserah. jangan bikin repot gue tapi ya.

yud1: you could feign ignorance. Or if its in your line of work, would it be possible to reject a work assignment?

yud1: selectiive pacisfism? not even believe in pacisfism, hahaha...
bothering you? errrr....

bekzilla: um, maybe don't shift the goalpost. do you condone the killing or not? I don't, but if you do, you do you. or maybe actually do that. I don't mind. 'righteous killing' is slippery slope, so 🤷

What goalpost am I shifting?

Kan lo bilang “jgn bikin repot gw”. So now I’m asking, bisa feign ignorance ga? Atau kalo emang the killing affects your line of work, can you reject the work assignment.

I mean “jgn bikin repot gw” implies that “lo bakal jadi repot” makanya gw nanya

Atau, if i’m to be more blunt “emang ngaruhnya apa ke elu kalo ceo dibunuh?”

galeshka: I remember you used to, well, or some variant of that, might be wrong though 🤔
doesn't really bother me. you do you. maybe actually do that too. just saying 'probably shouldn't', but well, you can try, if you really want to.

bekzilla: ooh, itu maksudnya kalau temen gue bunuh orang, terus gue ditanya-tanya, kan gue juga yang repot. udah itu aja sih. ga ada filosofisnya amat kok itu

And for the record, I potentially benefit from the killing of this CEO’s death. My company uses this insurance right after his death, there’s already one fucked up policy that was reversed. The limitations of anesthesia (i.e. no more than an hour of anesthesia is covered by the insurance)

lately I've been wondering if I lean toward the understanding that targeted violence can be justified. I'm not making an ethical or moral claim, so I can't say if it's "righteous" to do so. I'm thinking more of an effectual claim. if it leads to the betterment of the most marginalized of society then I'd say it can be justified.

I still think they are humans, but IMHO their status as an individual human being bears less relevance to their exercise of powe

for me killing should not be supported dan pelakunya harus dihukum accordingly, sayang nya ceo ceo asuransi ini secara ga langsung melakukan "killing" secara legal, ga ada instrumen hukum yg mumpuni buat menghukum mereka juga secara legal, ya mau ga mau robin hood bertindak, jadi dihukum accordingly by robin hood nya gue setuju

Yosu: very good point gak ada instrumen hukumnya jadi penghukumannya lewat extrajudicial measure