Nyan~ Neko Sugar Girls | Nyan~ Neko Sugar Girls Wiki...

大原さやか on Twitter

阿甘妙世界-火車上面有鱷魚 Alligators on a Train

Video game provides an imaginary ground for the power fantasy which is inseparable from feminism: a video game gives the player a image of being the one, the alpha, the unbeatable. Such an image or a sense of achievement is what a player usually lacks in their real life.

To accuse video games of approaching the male fantasy is just, yet such accusation, while attempting to deconstruct toxic masculinity, also denies players escapism from their probably miserable life.

(The power fantasy of video games is also why toxic communication in pvp multiplayer games is a lost cause.)

Bioshock Has the Best Beginning of Any Game Ever | E...

Totally Spies! Season 7 Reveal – Coming in 2024

Ian Ruins the Elbonian Sniper Corps

とあるん on X

*inseparable from which feminism criticizes

小光有一段沙漠裡搭列車 根本瘋狂麥斯XDMad Max: Fury Road (2015) - Moving into the sand sto...然後那個碎片跑進華戀胸口=冰雪女王的傳說
迷宮組=浮士德博士的改編

The Cosmic Wheel Sisterhood on Steam

志祺後悔讀成大？迎新宿營該去嗎？給大學新鮮人的真心話！《 志祺今天不讀稿 》EP011｜志祺七七

【解析】反正我很閒《自由五老頭》：極佳的場面調度，長鏡頭帶來的強力後勁！｜墨栞-Blackbookmar...

殭屍100 第四集好燃哦

【影評】奧本海默 Oppenheimer｜看不懂就對了！越想理解就越無法理解？！諾蘭集大成之作！原子彈結...

猶點德意的LA

FNF VS Sun the Pico Fangirl

Kite Man: Hell Yeah! | Official Teaser | Max

@jerrylov29 - 在FB聊的一點關於「色情」的看法 分享一下文藝復興時期很多大膽露的作品的原因是，因為文藝復興是在復興古希臘雅典美學，古希臘覺得自然人體就是完美的(不需要遮掩)，跟色情無關。

That One Terrible Gun Myth in Siege of Jadotville...

SIGNALIS - Train Ride [Extended]

SIGNALIS - Congratulations! (Animated)我要狂

How AoE2 is helping scientists understand ants用AOE2模擬澳洲本土量少質精的螞蟻V.S.外來量多質差時，開闊戰場比起複雜地形對本土菁英螞蟻不利，顯示因人類開發導致開闊地形增加使得本土種生存不利

乾電池久放會流電池液損害機體是常識
現在不知道為什麼大部分人都是整台壞掉才換的感覺...

舒伯特(Schubert, 1797-1828)：小夜曲(Standchen)D.957改编自第4首「天...

Harumin on X
因為這個取出機制在競速比賽裡是違規的（槍口指向在包包裡就已經朝向射手正側面），不能拿來參加ipsc或idpa（不過很帥是真的）

拉丁文的v念u
阿維會比阿北更接近原文(誰在乎)

ಠ_ಠ - 這裡有尼特的旅人嗎？ 想知道你們平常都怎麼過一天

如果羈絆是「非這群人/這人不可」，八點檔則是「用這群人/這人將就」(想到Mygo監督的訪談)

Magnum Rhino 200DS - Download Free 3D model by dooms...為甚麼是200DS XD
(原本是20DS)
Product Details

想買的玩具20DS絕版了 難過QQ

Si vis pacem, para bellum.
反戰？標語跟口號不能抵擋槍彈。
Pen may be mighter than sword, but stationery is not meant to be brought to a gunfight.

Why Penrose Tiles Never RepeatPenrose Tiling: 五組平行線用相同的角度交錯構成的圖形。如果只看其圖案中一定數量的一直線色塊，會發現色塊的排列絕不會重複(因為Pentagrid penrose的36度角跟72度角的兩種色塊的數量比成黃金比例，其他數量的平行線產生的色塊數量比也會呈現一準週期數)。Signalis的劇情就好像是沿著Penrose中的一直線前進一樣，相似的部分用不同的方式不斷重複排列組合，以至於整個故事(甚至不能說是故事)只能說是一段劇情─只是非重複排列色塊群體的一小部分而已，然而前進的越多，劇情的整體調性只會不斷浮動，不會有一固定的概念可以捕捉(就像色塊數量比是黃金比例，色塊越多比例只會越接近黃金比例)。

From the signalis community on Reddit: Why Penrose T...

不斷浮動，無法掌握而讓人感到不安與恐懼，永遠無法完全理解，又像黃衣之王哈斯塔一樣。Signalis簡直能說是近代把藝術/文學/數學完美轉譯到遊戲上的神作。

Signalis - Cycles, Infinity, And Making Reality

開頭畫面似圓型的六角Hexagon Penrose圖案，每張地圖都要收集6把鑰匙才能通過，用物品欄提示文件直接跟你說Remember the rule of six。甚至遊戲封面的Elster拿著六發子彈的犀牛轉輪手槍(我覺得製作組Rose-Engine當初選這把犀牛也是因為其彈巢較其他轉輪手槍更接近六角柱形，也就是更接近Penrose的圖案)而非初始的捷克半自動手槍CZ75。

atelier on X

Give me a bocchi, bartender

"Peace was never an option" doesn't mean that we choose violence ourselves, but that peace requires more than sheer willpower to achieve: peace requires stable economy, cultural consensus, and trust from both or all sides.

Harley Quinn S4超讚...根本二十世紀後半女性主義史教科書...還很好笑

The Alt-Right Playbook: Never Play Defense

回應A簡短錯誤的戴帽子指控只會讓你正確卻冗長的回答看起來像是占下風，更糟糕的是他這頂簡單有效的帽子得到更多聲量，散佈給更多想幫別人戴帽子的詭辯者。電視電影娛樂喜歡呈現正論必勝的場面，但事實是解釋的一方永遠會輸（因為看起來不費吹灰之力就讓解釋方講一大堆的指控方一定贏）。

栞 Lyrics-MARUMARU栞我真的聽一次哭一次

成名前靠自己、成名後相忍為國！沉默寡言的莊智淵，為何曾氣到退出國家隊？｜志祺七七中華民國在愛國這點跟美國相反：美國的愛國是愛到批評人種歧視會被當成批評美國，中是愛國的人會指責你怎麼不跟他一樣愛這個會為他帶來私利與安全的國。

女學而立──台灣女性學學會30年紀念文集

"The right has learned that if you never look like you're losing, you can convince a lot of people that you're not." That reminded me of Contrapoints' video "The Aesthetic" - winning a debate in the eyes of the public is not about being factually or logically correct. It's all about pageantry. We're in the circus, not the forum

Playing dumb is a really important tactic that I don't see leftists using - think smart people are just uncomfortable looking dumb. But you can avoid some arguments entirely and still reveal their lies this way. If he says "She stole all that money from people!" You can say,

"Oh wow, really? didn't know about this. What do you mean? Who did she steal from? When did this happen?" Now it's not an argument, just a person who made a claim and someone who wants to know more, someone he might want to try and convince. Putting you down and trying to look like the "winner" doesn't work for him in this situation.

If he stays quippy and vague, keep asking questions, prodding at all those lies of omission. "Wait, you're saying she stole from the people who donated to her?" He might keep withholding, looking like he's hiding something and now he's playing defense. Or he'll have to give more details and reveal the fact that he's full of shit.

Or he'll send you a link to some bullshit article - "Wait, think you sent me the wrong article. This is talking about that project she did. Could you send the one about her stealing?" Or he'll