I can't believe I spent two days reading a 736-paragraph case document about vexatious litigants and their hilarious attempts at invoking 'magical solutions' to get out of legal obligations. 2012 ABQB 571 (CanLII) | Meads v. Meads | CanLII
Examples: saying they are 'sovereign citizens' of which the laws of the country do not apply to them, invoking some fictitious separation of their legal identity and their "flesh-and-blood self" who is immune to the liabilities their legal identity may have("You say John James Smith has unpaid taxes? I don't see why it is connected to me, 'John-James:Smith')