Sachiv says
2016-04-28T10:45:44.000Z
I thought this was interesting in the news today and it raises a lot of questions, like does facebook legally own the word 'gram' Instagram insists littergram app is renamed - BBC Ne...
latest #11
Sachiv says
2016-04-28T10:46:21.000Z
I mean surely gram is a fairly well used derivative of the word telegram and no one owns the rights to the word?
Sachiv says
2016-04-28T10:47:35.000Z
By the same token, say I wanted to start an art project where people put a pic of their face up every year to chronicle their aging and I called it Facebank, would facebook claim to own the word face?
Sachiv says
2016-04-28T10:47:42.000Z
Likewise with the word book?
立即下載
Sachiv says
2016-04-28T10:48:26.000Z
I think this guy should refuse to change the name and let's see if the law can prove that facebook/instagram own the word gram.
̈*✶Whimsy✶* ̈
2016-04-28T12:14:22.000Z
yeah it's pretty ballsy on fb's behalf
̈*✶Whimsy✶* ̈
2016-04-28T12:15:39.000Z
maybe it was a decision made by one of these youngin's that doesn't know what a telegram is, or had a candygram etc
Stereo Nacht
2016-04-28T14:57:26.000Z
Whith Candy Crisis Saga (or whatever) trying to say they own the word "saga", now everyone wants to claim they own common words. The one similar claim that had at least some grouds
Stereo Nacht
2016-04-28T14:59:08.000Z
Was Apple's with its use of the lower-case "i" in front of some of their product names. It's not a word, it's a particular use of a letter.
Stereo Nacht
2016-04-28T15:01:34.000Z
So "iCare" would infringe on their trademark, but any other variation (ICare, I-Care, etc) would be fine. Ahem. TL:-DR: stupid claim by FB. (blush)
::Bryony::
2016-04-28T16:14:14.000Z
Would they challenge the Queen for sending telegrams to folks that reach their 100th birthday? That's asking for a Royal handbagging.
::Bryony::
2016-04-28T16:14:29.000Z
back to top