Miguel wonders
15 years ago
what the 13yr old british dad thinks of what he did... :-(
latest #34
Agnes says
15 years ago
ano meron dun?
☼Pepe☼
15 years ago
Hmm... Well, let us set first the assumptions of our argument. Firstly, let us assume that we shall look on this on a purely religious stand
☼Pepe☼
15 years ago
If that were the case, then the only sin he would h have committed was to have sex before marriage
立即下載
☼Pepe☼
15 years ago
But, considering the legal standards of his country, he wouldn't even be allowed to get married
KYLE! says
15 years ago
nandidiri parin ako dun hanggang ngaun :-&
Agnes says
15 years ago
ahh the 13 yr old dad ok
☼Pepe☼
15 years ago
Our religion in itself does not state an age limit in the sacrament of holy matrimony; only the law states that
☼Pepe☼
15 years ago
Perhaps... if the law would have allowed him to, he would have married the wife, then had the child, making what he did perfectly moral
Miguel says
15 years ago
speaking of religion, he might not have sinned because of innocence
Miguel says
15 years ago
- that's a might...
☼Pepe☼
15 years ago
A big "mig
KYLE! says
15 years ago
kadiri parin.. :-&
☼Pepe☼
15 years ago
A big *might* indeed. But due to his current factors, we could not truly say whether what he did was moral or immoral
☼Pepe☼
15 years ago
It is indeed moral for him to accept his obligation as a father. I guess that consolidates his standpoint on his idea of reproduction
KYLE! says
15 years ago
i really don't believe that they don't know a thing before they did the thing
Miguel says
15 years ago
ofcourse we cant... who are we to judge him. we can only speculate
☼Pepe☼
15 years ago
But I believe that since he is indeed willing to take responsibility as the child's father, then that gives him all the right to have a chil
Miguel says
15 years ago
mistform: me too... I blame sex-education and the british society for this, but not entirely
Miguel says
15 years ago
jpmaglutac: he certainly made the right choice of not aborting the child... that's another problem
☼Pepe☼
15 years ago
The fact that you "blame" someone means that there was some sort of injustice committed. I ask you, what injustice was there? (unsure)
Miguel says
15 years ago
altho, when asked how he could support the child financially, he answered, "what's financially?"
☼Pepe☼
15 years ago
One cannot blame another for ignorance :-P Although, of course it would not be practical to do what he did, I see nothing immoral in it
Miguel says
15 years ago
jpmaglutac: not injustice but the society, their gov in particular, made a wrong move on destroying their innocence
Miguel says
15 years ago
I also think it wasn't immoral, at least I want to believe it isn't
☼Pepe☼
15 years ago
EXACTLY! If he wants to have a child, then he should have the freedom to have a child :-(
Miguel says
15 years ago
i agree but i hope he can live up to his wants by being a responsible parent...
☼Pepe☼
15 years ago
I hope so too :-D
Miguel says
15 years ago
how can he bring up the baby? did he really think of that when he committed the act?
☼Pepe☼
15 years ago
Perhaps he did, perhaps he didn't. Perhaps he thought he wanted a baby, but didn't think of how hard it would be to have one
Miguel says
15 years ago
thats also posible
Miguel says
15 years ago
i hope the phil will never be like britain now
carl says
15 years ago
what we can do perhaps is to pray for him... :-))
back to top