Socialisation, not biology, is the root of this.

which is why guys can just fuck and go. For them it's all about biology, not what they actually feel.

Okay, I know that you're not trying to cause wank and neither am I, but I resent this.

Some guys can fuck and go, yes, but so can some girls I've known.

but men are the ones who make it like it's "no big deal"

if women do it, they are called "whores"

truth. A guys sleeps with 10 women he's a BAMF a girl sleeps with 10 guys she's a whore and a slut

hello double standards, how are you?

double standards aside, I know what you mean OP, and I get kind of envious of men and women who can avoid attachment

attached to everyone I so much as kiss. It's not just you. But i think sleeping around is over rated

why you would want to have sex without getting attached?

because it's fun?

asking the OP what their specific reasons are. i think there are quite a few possibilities, and that's probably where more of the issue is

orite

I'm not trying to argue that western culture does not have lots of male privilege, and I am definitely not trying to argue that that's right

I'm trying to argue that no, men don't all just "fuck and go", many of us actually care what we feel not just some biological imperative to

stick our penis in something.

agrees with this. Wanting to have sex and not get attached does not imply some inherent masculine trait.

the wanting clearly is not, but I think the OP is suggesting that the ability to do so IS

does not think the OP is suggesting all men DO

yes, I think it was just some particularly unfortunate wording.

My argument was more levelled at geekygoddessgirl than the OP tbh.

ahh

funny as this post is coming on the heels of me trying to convince my g/f that I can indeed have sex w/ a guy unemotionally

and most of my female counterparts scream "OH NO YOU CAN'T SEX IS ALWAYS EMOTIONAL BLAH BLAH BLAH"

if you are capable of distancing physical and emotional, you can do it. If you generally cannot anyway, don't bother.