the author is clearly biased against Obama. Here's why:

he faults Obama for having ties to someone in 2006 and earlier who in 2007 signed an agreement with Muslim extremists

a guy who is his relative

he faults Obama for having ties to someone who has followers who practice genocide, which was not yet true when Obama had ties to him

and for having ties to someone who has ties to extremist Muslims, which was also not true at the time that Obama had ties to him

if you ignore the timeline, as this author did, this is very scary

but if you look at the timeline, Obama had ties to him that ended before the guy did the things that the author faults

this is just another attempt to tie Obama to terrorism that has no basis in reality

and frankly, I'm tired of the hate-mongering slander

the only way that this author can reasonably justify attacking Obama for having had ties to someone who later had ties to "bad guys"

is if the author thinks that Obama can tell the future

I didn't read anything about Obama to being a terrorist in this. No one thinks that Obama is a terrorist just because Ayers is.

I think Obama is the one that has said people are saying he is a terrorist. I've never heard anyone call him such.

Just like I never heard anyone tell me I should be afraid of him because he has a funny name and is black.

But I heard Obama say that that is what people would tell me.

To be honest I'm sick of it all myself. They are all a bunch of liars. Obama included.