ChefKarl
3 days ago
latest #13
ChefKarl
3 days ago
Not on your life.
SteveBob
3 days ago
I'm a lot more likely to buy a Tesla, and that's a 0%.
Nutmeg
3 days ago
snorts in fluent healthcare professional
立即下載
heylisa
3 days ago
Nutmeg
3 days ago
Part of the problem with this kind of "teaching" is that, invariably, the images offered tend to be images showing disease or injury. The AI never really "learns" what a normal [body part] looks like.
ChefKarl
3 days ago
mthorkveld: exactly
Nutmeg
3 days ago
Frankly, it reminds me of something I learned about in a history of medicine lecture. Centuries ago, anatomical textbooks were ... not exactly accurate. There was a lot of ideological bias going into the illustrations.
Nutmeg
3 days ago
Consequently, on those rare occasions when students got to see the dissection of an actual human corpse, the body didn't match the illustration.
Nutmeg
3 days ago
When that happened, it was frequently asserted that the body was deformed or wrong somehow. The book was assumed to be an infallible representation.
Nutmeg
3 days ago
(We're talking early medieval period, here.)
Dawne / Livvy
3 days ago
that's a hell no!
Luna.Kate
2 days ago
So the people were are vaccine adverse bc who knows what’s on the vaccine will upload their sensitive data to an AI platform... makes sense.
back to top