The only things that made me raise an eyebrow were 2 comments the content creator made about the demo

You can't control party members

and

The combat in the demo was better than the story. There was no hook or interest in the characters within the demo, but the combat is fun.

Control over party members is whatever. I like to micro manage but I know that's not everyone's thing

Oh and mission based, not open-world. Which I think a lot will appreciate. Again, I like open world but eh.

BUT THE STORY BEING LESS INTERESTINGgggggggg

It's one opinion. I'm trying to find others to see if it's a one-off cause it's just an opinion

But now I'm all kinds of A Worry

I will say the story impacting characters CHOOSING to CAST SPELLS issssssssssssss

OUCH

The "spoilery" part is blacked out:

So her skill tree ends up looking like this:

Meaning those are off the table, she won't use them cause she angy

More dmg is good but at what cost

I think that's actually the only thing I've seen that I'm excited about

It's a really interesting take on choice focused games and I'm really curious to see just how much of an impact it might have good or bad

Anyway, that is all. Thank you for coming to my TED Talk.

YEAH I saw someone make a comment of "Well, who used tactics camera in Inquisition anyway? So it's no loss."

And I was like ME. I DID. I USED IT ALL THE GODDAMN TIME.

Because my favorite classes were fighter and two-dagger rogue and I AM AFRAID OF SPIDERS!!! So when I knew they were coming I'd hop to controlling the mage to firebomb them from a distance while everyone else went in close.

Yeah, it was certainly useful

I'm guessing the lack of full control is maybe Because of the companions literally refusing to do certain things depending on their mood and your poor choices

Yeah, if that's part of it, it'd be hard to mix that + allowing player control