我覺得可以了

I feel like both of us are good now

he is enjoying his life

and I am too

( I will too)

I would not have worse life than you ofc

you r showing off your life that is a bit hilarious tbh

a bit childish

hmm nah, it might be the amn will do
Normally man do like that I know
ame as my brother

ah not really, my brother not really do that
he only sent to me
not in public

Ok Yvette

Enjoy your life too

cannot we worse then him OK

it is 4/21
the end of semester is june/16
the start of S2 is july 22

that will be a month in between
FIND A INTERNSHIP

from june
OK it is time to hand in the portfolio
Really have to

And the project A topic

which is necessary

I have an idea now, maybe it is not a topic for project A/ (◍︎´꒳`◍︎)B
But I am struggle about the positionality (position/ positionality)

I am a person who live in fully capitalisation environment, despite I would say I live in county and with fields and farmlands surrounding, aka I have lived in suburb in my childhood

I thought that was nature, but, in fact, that was not "nature"; that was cultivated fields with monoculture plants.

means, manipulating by business, mooney, and capitalism.

Capitalisation 資本化 (N.)
Capitalise 資本 (v.)/ 大寫
Capitalism 資本主義 (N.)

I am struggle about my personal positionality

It is a bit hard isn't it

Shit so I have to had the studio experience and try to understand what I really like in here?
sight, big sight

I should start sending out the mail in fact.
So terrible

Start thinking about my statement and strenth

Project AB/ Alice course: the process of Landscape Architecture Design. The Material Process

Phenomenology/ „Phenomenology of landscape” is an ambigous expression. It may denote en bloc various contempo- rary approaches to landscapes focusing on human practices taking place in various environments and hence treating landscapes as “more-than-visual and more-than-symbolic”.

Post-humanism/ degrade the human existing in the land; landscape = human culture + land/ BUT? should it be landscape = creatures + land? (but what is Land? vegetations? ＧWithout animals

Post-humanism/ degrade the human existing in the land; landscape = human culture + land/ BUT? should it be landscape = creatures + land? (but what is Land? vegetations? Geomorphologial it self without animals?

( topology 拓墣學）

Ah! with the technical-oriened, that will be BIM? in landscape? (I can learn Revit as well)/ Rhino? Gresshopper?/

If I am going to set up a system with plants growth, is that too technical?
How can I connect it back to landscape issue?
with the big database and set up the graphic and digital information?

How can I connect it back to landscape issue?

How can I connect it back to landscape issue?

the history? the "monster"? the "haunted ghost?"

the plants nervous system? (it will become just about their ph value)

Gentrification issue in city?
The citytopia? world?
what did the old man said in the class, the Utopia, what is that mean?
The communism 共產/ socialism 社會主義

this is about human life/

what if about NATURE?
the natural element? factor?

The boundary between human being and non-human life being
(a Human Exceptionalism seperated)

//Losting culture in Taiwan?
I was inspired by Indian in fact

Ironically

// what can I do if I realise I am white-washed?

I am a fxxing Asian, it is super crazy
but I am white-washed????

Taiwan is ... cool I have to say

OKOK＿＿＿
那邊有人，
我要偷發這邊

令人擔憂的是，我們那麼重視價值觀的差異，就很難對在意的人保持尊重。然而，研究顯示，彼此尊重才能維持長久的關係。在實驗室中，專家觀察伴侶的互動，只要有一方展現輕蔑的態度，嚴重鄙視對方，後來總是以離婚收場。有些人會發生外遇，主因就是感受不到伴侶的愛慕，也就是全心全意的尊重。

當彼此價值觀不同時，該如何保持尊重？首先，先了解尊重的含意，基本原則就是「己所不欲、勿施於人」，待人以誠。尊重也是一種信任感。你相信對方值得尊重、天生有價值、有尊嚴，在道德上不低於你或任何人。也許你不贊同他的行為，認為當中有需改進之處，因此保持疏離，但你不會把他當成次等人。你懂得欣賞每個人本來的樣子，尊重他的生活經驗，不會指望對方變成另一種人。因此，當你覺得很難尊重對方，就代表你沒有發揮足夠的同理心。就算你們互動頻繁，也只是表面上的來往。

價值觀不同 是需要磨合或根本不適合？

對方的價值觀跟自己不同，有時真的很難尊重他，特別是他踩到你的底線，違背你的核心價值。這時你必須決定是否繼續往來、改變相處方式或乾脆一刀兩斷。

我們在第九章會繼續討論如何處理這種僵局。不論你是否尊重對方，你仍然可以行禮如儀，至少在行為上尊重對方。既然想要被尊重，就先尊重對方，你的一言一行體現了公平的價值。

找出彼此重視的核心價值
每個人價值觀總是不同，但這些差異是否嚴重，可由四個因素去判定：
＊彼此的關係有多密切，是否建立在共同的價值觀上面。
＊哪些價值觀不同。
＊有差別的價值觀對各自有多重要。
＊這些價值觀是否彼此衝突。

如果你們關係很親密，一定會有許多的共同價值觀，但也有各自珍視的核心價值。比方說，在道德上，你每件事情都要保護對方，而對方重視個人自由；在感情上，你注重親密互動，而對方想要獨立和自由。這樣的價值觀差異就很難克服。

如果只有一方堅持自己的價值觀，那就沒有人需要妥協，兩人的關係就不會出問題。有的人就是喜歡直來直往，講話直白、也不喜歡聽到刻意討好的話，但是你的伴侶對這點沒意見，那兩人就不會因此有摩擦。

不過，若兩人所重視的價值觀剛好對立，那相處上就會很痛苦，因為彼此的需求有衝突。你喜歡直來直往，但朋友認為在社交場合講話要得體而婉轉，以維持和諧的氣氛。那麼雙方的需求就很難得到滿足。除此之外，還有些人非常強調彼此要有共同的價值觀。所以當價值觀有衝突時，要仔細了解對方的需求。

＿

喜歡跟愛不一樣，在於，我只是喜歡他，我還希望他變成我喜歡的樣子。
愛，是我喜歡他不管他是什麼樣子的

我知道你很愛我，但我只是喜歡你而已，我喜歡你這個人，但我發現我不喜歡你的文化背景，所以我決定離開，因為我知道最終我還是會傷害你。因為我並不愛你

但我不知道我為什麼也會想你，可能我覺得很抱歉，也可能我覺得不習慣。
我看到林楷哲拍那麼好看的照片，我就會覺得。好好喔，羨慕宅宅！！
希望你也是那樣的。我也想要找會拍照的。好好笑啊我寫下來就發現，喔好像其實跟你講然後你也可能做到啊？

不好說，印度人美感之可悲

雖然我相信你是聰明的啦

我覺得就算我們現在又在一起了，就算我們最後走在一起了。
我知道會為我的選擇負責，但我

但我不知道，我會不會開心。

這才是問題所在吧

你會開心嗎？你可能也不會開心啊是吧？
如果你一直變成我喜歡的那樣子（反正我當然是會開心
我也不知道你喜歡什麼樣子的，可能會煮印度菜的吧