blackcat15 thinks
14 years ago
Few teams are willing to spend in MLB. e.g. Phillies. Your stadium is taxpayer-funded & you can't squeeze an extra $9MM on Cliff Lee? C'mon.
latest #13
low
14 years ago
that trade was less about dumping salary and more about keeping a strong farm system
blackcat15
14 years ago
The 3 guys Philies got in the trade are not what you expected to receive when you have a player as good as Cliff Lee.
blackcat15
14 years ago
Aumont only have 100 innings, Gilles still haven't reach AA, and Remirez basically is as raw as a prospect can be.
立即下載
blackcat15
14 years ago
If Phillies really want to restock, the 2 draft picks they got when Lee is signed elsewhere will not be much different than those 3 guys.
low
14 years ago
aumont has closer-upside
low
14 years ago
gilles will play in the bigs some day
low
14 years ago
and ramirez could be a starter
low
14 years ago
for one year of cliff lee
low
14 years ago
not a bad trade. and the two draft picks come only if they offer him arbitration
low
14 years ago
right now seattle look like winners in the trade but I don't think it's that bad
blackcat15
14 years ago
If Lee really wants a CC type of contract, he will almost certainly reject arb.
blackcat15
14 years ago
of course trade is always a trade-off between present and future, but Philies had a chance to improve aprox. 6 wins by retaining Lee
blackcat15
14 years ago
that kind of opportunity doesn't occur very often
back to top