Kyoto Protocol was compromise for the lessening of CO2 emission, determined concreate level for each developed nations.

But the protocol was criticized as "no Teeth", that is no penalty. Yet US, they rejected. And then required, it should be cofined as

As just "pledge" for decreasing emission of green house gas.

China or other developing countries which are suffered from climate change are angry about that.

for preventing climate change, the limit of using petrol is inevitable. But it needs long time.

As Economist of last week, it was introduced the challenge in developing countries, in which they save forest, reduce CO2.

For that challenge, money is needed, for keeping their motivation, discouraging their intention to destroy nature.

Developing countries should be blamed for climate change, cover the cost for keeping forest.

↑ developed countries mis-type...