... anyone? :<

probably no. i mean, how else could we bomb korea?

are we doing your homework now?

a world that's categorically nuke-free will have a lower potential for death on a massive scale

however, reaching a nuke-free state is practically impossible based on the desires of nations to possess weapons of ultimate retaliation

'reflect' means you don't have to answer the questions as yes/no, too.

Mm, I have to do a reflective essay in class tomorrow. I'm going to be on the "no" side, I think. *makes notes*

no nukes won't make people more peaceful... just less susceptible to fiery death.

and the 'no' side could also argue that proliferation/M.A.D. has led to *fewer* major wars, because they would be too risky.

just give the bastards fewer options- which is a good first step. Testosterone dampening sprays would help more.

agrees that we should get rid of nuclear weapons, but also thinks that we should get rid of guns, too. Let's go back to melee combat!

"OK, no more guns! How am I going to enforce that? Well... I have this gun, see..."

Wrote the essay. I think I wet fine. I'll tell you what I get.

to flashman, "I know, but it would be great if there were some way to do it."