Login
Sign Up For Free
English
中文 (繁體)
中文 (香港)
中文 (简体)
日本語
Filipino
Bahasa Indonesia
Bahasa Melayu
Pусский
Português (Brasil)
Magyar
Français
Español
Deutsch
Čeština
العربية
Català
Dansk
Ελληνικά
فارسی
Suomi
Gaeilge
Hindi
עברית
Hrvatski
Italiano
Norsk bokmål
Nederlands
한국어
Polski
Română
Slovenský
Svenska
Türkçe
українська
беларуская
ไทย
Standard view
Genuine
thinks
16 years ago
its sad that Plurk does not have the reach nor does it have the audience as with the Twitter brigade.
latest #13
Connie
thinks
16 years ago
it's sad that every time I try to use Twitter I have maybe a 50/50 chance of getting a tweet through.
finucane
says
16 years ago
What Plurk lacks in users is more than made up by how much those users post Plurks.
finucane
says
16 years ago
I follow about half as many people on Plurk that I do on Twitter, but get nearly 10x the posts.
立即下載
Connie
16 years ago
finucane
and I get a very high quality of conversation with very engaged people.
Genuine
says
16 years ago
Having nearly 200 followers and following nearly that many has a big disadvantage. Wish I could move them all over to many diff netowrks.
Genuine
says
16 years ago
That way when a network goes down the other picks it up. Its like having a backup generator
Connie
16 years ago
But with them not automatically following, then you wind up having different friends at different networks.
Connie
16 years ago
I mean friends not automatically following you from one network to the other.
Genuine
says
16 years ago
This is another plus for Friend Feed I guess well if you use it for that
Genuine
wants
16 years ago
to see if Twitter would offer a premium to heavy users. I would pay a little for the service.
Connie
says
16 years ago
but I wpil
Connie
16 years ago
would not pay until service is stable. Catch 22
Connie
16 years ago
would not pay until service is stable. Catch 22
back to top
delete
reply
edit
cancel
cancel