AllenaTapiaTheWriter asks
16 years ago
whats the latest on RSS and copyright? I feel that RSS is for individual use and doesn't give someone the right to repost my entire entry.
latest #47
AllenaTapiaTheWriter says
16 years ago
am I wrong? It's likely!lol.
marjorie says
16 years ago
RSS is basically just a subscription service, not a copyright free space. You own your copyright regardless of how content is disseminated
marjorie says
16 years ago
Now, I'm not an attorney, but the rules of copyright are pretty cut and dried in that respect.
立即下載
marjorie says
16 years ago
Agreed also. I met another 20-yr-old intern of mine who believed creative people should find another way to make money.
marjorie says
16 years ago
He wanted their creative output to be free to everyone. As a RIGHT. Uh-huh. Whatever.
AllenaTapiaTheWriter says
16 years ago
wow. thanks guys. Raj, I had u in mind for this question.
AllenaTapiaTheWriter says
16 years ago
u would not beleive how many people repost my About.com blog and then ARGUE with me that I am wrong!
marjorie says
16 years ago
Yeah, not Gen-X (that's me). More like Gen-Y, the one who grew up w/ the Internet.
marjorie says
16 years ago
have you tried to post something at the bottom saying that it's copyrighted & cannot be reposted anywhere w/o permission?
marjorie says
16 years ago
That won't stop the unscrupulous, but at least they can't say they weren't forewarned.
marjorie says
16 years ago
great. more good news for writers.
marjorie says
16 years ago
Oh well. I take heart in noting that most of the people who scrape my blogs and articles have crappy Web sites w/ no community.
marjorie says
16 years ago
If they're making money, it's not as much as I make from the original content.
marjorie says
16 years ago
Really? Crap. Most of my published stuff is offline, actually, other than my blogs. I've decided not to waste my time chasing after scrapers
marjorie says
16 years ago
and more time creating more good content.
marjorie says
16 years ago
Check this article from our local paper out. The guy ticks me off big-time.
marjorie says
16 years ago
he's an example of just this kind of activity, not just in what he did but in his attitude towards creative copyright.
marjorie says
16 years ago
Oh well. If they want to spend those resources doing that, more power to them. I'm too small potatoes and too busy to worry about it.
marjorie says
16 years ago
I could theoretically do the same thing, but I can't be bothered. I'm doing what I love, making decent money from it.
marjorie says
16 years ago
Maybe when Im' JK Rowling rich, I'll go after them. But for now it's just too big to worry about.
marjorie says
16 years ago
I know! We're the kings of content! :-) They can never take that away from us.
marjorie says
16 years ago
Oh, but I can dream. I'd be happy with Danielle Steel's mo ney, tho. Or Stephen King's.
back to top