lizstraussaskswhere's the line at what's social media?
posted on July 02, 2008 at 01:45PM
19 responses
to this plurk.
July 02, 2008 at 13:47Shai Cogginssaysdo we really need to define lines with social media?
July 02, 2008 at 13:49rjleamansaysCurrent web definition of social media seems to be quite narrow: web-based tech tools to enable group conversation?
July 02, 2008 at 13:50ScreamstresssaysPeople connect for so many different reasons...but it's the connection that counts.
July 02, 2008 at 13:53lizstrausssaysshai Coggins I don't like lines much either.
July 02, 2008 at 13:54lizstrausssaysIt really is about the connection and not the tools.
July 02, 2008 at 13:55HighDefsaysI like to think outside the box. Everything evolves, so "social media" today will be different tomorrow. It is what we think it is.
July 02, 2008 at 13:59iContactsaysit all depends on what direction you're using SM. Web 2.0 for online conversation/participation/research, or Enterprise 2.0 for business?
July 02, 2008 at 14:00ConnieConnections trump tools, yet without them social media would not be recognized as such today. We were connecting on BBS's back in the day.
July 02, 2008 at 14:01ConnieBut that wasn't social media, which is a convergence of social computing technologies and ability for everyone to be a publisher of content.
July 02, 2008 at 14:02ConnieAdd people into that mix and you have social media.
July 02, 2008 at 14:11CommunityMGRsaysit should be noted, that the "content" should somehow be monitored for validity, or else you have rampant invalid data corruption in SM.
July 02, 2008 at 14:30Beth Hartesaysthis sounds like a topic for a PlurkShop. I agree that it's the tools and the conversations. But I think it's going to evolve and change.
July 02, 2008 at 14:31Beth Harteaskswho is the judge of what content is "valid?"
July 02, 2008 at 14:33ConnieHave no idea what CommunityMgr is referring to.
July 02, 2008 at 14:45LindaZsaystools allow the community and conversation, but communities will always find ways to communicate, tools are created by people who want...
July 02, 2008 at 14:45LindaZsayscommunity and communication... and round and round we go
July 02, 2008 at 15:24jennydeckisaysWhen a group of two or more come together in the name of media.
July 02, 2008 at 15:49acnattasayswell we wouldn't need to start the conversation again, we'd just need to point folks to lizstrauss' question..
July 02, 2008 at 17:53lizstrausssaysacnatta Thanks. Though I bet all agree the question is bigger than my blog post.